Behind the Sale / Negotiation / Leopold

The Buyer Was Already Offering the Most. I Negotiated Another $35,000.

A real negotiation case study by Vincent John, Licensed Estate Agent

One serious purchaser. A $50,000 gap to the next-best offer. And one negotiation that could make or break the result.

Most homeowners assume the best way to achieve a higher sale price is to have multiple buyers competing against each other.

But what happens when one buyer is already offering considerably more than everyone else?

How do you negotiate another $35,000 without risking the strongest offer you've received?

That's exactly the situation I faced as the selling agent in Leopold.

It shows why finding a buyer and negotiating a strong outcome are two very different skills.

It Started With a $100,000 Pricing Challenge

The property had been advertised approximately $100,000 above my original market estimate, at the owner's request.

Every homeowner naturally wants to maximise their sale price, and I understood the desire to test the market.

But ambitious pricing carries risks.

When buyers perceive a property as significantly overpriced, they may not enquire, even if they genuinely like it.

In this case, the campaign attracted fewer enquiries and offers than we had hoped.

Eventually, we had a clear frontrunner.

One purchaser was genuinely interested and prepared to make a substantially stronger offer than anyone else.

That sounds like good news.

And it was.

Until you considered what could happen next.

One Buyer. One Opportunity. A Potential $50,000 Problem.

Our leading purchaser was well ahead of the next-best offer.

By up to $50,000.

Think about what that meant for my seller.

If we accepted the initial offer without negotiating, we might be leaving money on the table.

But if I pushed too hard and the purchaser walked away, our next-best opportunity was significantly lower. Suddenly, the negotiation wasn't just about getting more money. It was about protecting what we already had. And that distinction mattered.

I had to negotiate for a better result without jeopardising the result that was already within reach.

It's a situation where an agent can easily lose composure. Some become overly cautious and recommend accepting the offer immediately. Others push aggressively, assuming the buyer will simply keep increasing. Neither approach appealed to me.

I needed a strategy.

The Question That Changed the Negotiation

Instead of focusing on what the other buyers were offering, I asked myself a different question:

Why might this property be worth more to this particular purchaser?

That question changed how I approached the conversation. Because the value of a home isn't always determined solely by its land size, bedroom count or recent comparable sales. Those things matter enormously. But so do the features that make a property difficult to replace.

And so do the circumstances of the person buying it. I began by carefully presenting evidence from comparable sales. Not simply throwing numbers at the purchaser, but explaining how those properties compared and highlighting the unique qualities of the Leopold home. Features that weren't necessarily easy to find elsewhere.

Reasons this property deserved serious consideration on its own merits. But there was another important factor. Something that couldn't be measured in square metres.

Sometimes Peace of Mind Has Real Value

The purchaser needed to find a home quickly. That was important. Because when you're facing a time-sensitive move, finding the right property isn't just about negotiating the lowest possible purchase price. It's also about certainty.

Being able to make plans. Knowing where you're going to live. Avoiding another weekend of inspections, another missed opportunity or another period of uncertainty. I recognised that securing this particular home could offer the purchaser something valuable beyond its physical features.

Peace of mind.

That doesn't mean using someone's circumstances against them.

It means understanding what matters to the person you're negotiating with.

A purchaser may place greater value on a property that genuinely suits their needs, particularly when the alternatives are less convenient or difficult to find.

My role was to communicate the value of the home, supported by evidence, while respecting the purchaser's freedom to make their own decision.

And I knew that simply pointing to other offers wasn't going to be enough.

The Most Important Part? Knowing What Not to Say.

Here's where the negotiation became particularly delicate. I knew the next-best offer was substantially lower. But there was no advantage in volunteering another purchaser's exact offer. That information wasn't necessary to demonstrate why this home was worth securing.

I kept the discussion focused on genuine interest in the property, relevant market evidence and the qualities that made the home desirable. I didn't need to invent competing bids. I didn't need to exaggerate another buyer's position. And I certainly didn't need to reveal confidential information.

Instead, I focused on building a credible case for value. At the same time, I acted quickly to keep the leading purchaser engaged. That was essential. A negotiation can lose momentum when communication slows, uncertainty grows or either party begins to disengage.

I wanted to maintain the purchaser's confidence in the process while continuing to advocate strongly for my seller.

The aim wasn't to win an argument. It was to achieve a better agreement.

And that required knowing when to push, when to listen and when to allow the value of the property to do the talking.

Then Came the Extra $35,000.

The leading purchaser increased the initial offer.

Not by $5,000.

Not by $10,000.

By $35,000.

An additional $35,000 for my seller. And crucially, we retained the strongest purchaser rather than risking the opportunity and potentially facing a much lower alternative. This wasn't a conventional bidding war. We didn't have two evenly matched purchasers continually outbidding each other.

We had one purchaser already significantly ahead. The negotiation required a different approach: understanding motivation, demonstrating value and remaining composed when the financial stakes were high. For my seller, the outcome was another $35,000 above the initial offer. But the part that meant the most to me came afterwards.

The Seller's Verdict

The seller's published review captures the result better than any claim I could make about my own work. Reading those words was incredibly rewarding. Because what I wanted the seller to experience wasn't simply a successful transaction. I wanted the seller to feel confident that someone was genuinely fighting for their interests. Someone who understood the stakes.

Someone who wouldn't panic because buyer competition was limited.

And someone who would keep negotiating when there was a credible opportunity to improve the result.

The additional $35,000 mattered.

But so did the trust.

Here's What I'd Want Every Homeowner to Understand

The highest offer isn't necessarily the highest offer a purchaser is prepared to make.

Finding a buyer is important. Finding several buyers is even better. But neither guarantees that an agent will negotiate the strongest possible outcome. Sometimes you have multiple interested purchasers.

Sometimes you have one. And sometimes that one purchaser is so far ahead of everyone else that the entire negotiation depends on how well your agent understands the situation. That's when experience, composure and preparation become especially valuable. Because effective negotiation isn't about being the loudest person in the room.

It's about understanding the evidence. Understanding people. Recognising opportunities. And knowing how to pursue a better outcome without unnecessarily risking the sale.

For this Leopold homeowner, that approach produced another $35,000. And the seller's words said something I could never say quite as convincingly myself:

“He fought hard for me.”

That's what I believe every homeowner deserves from their agent. Not someone who simply passes offers back and forth.

Someone who knows what to do when the real negotiation begins.

Privacy and results disclaimer: This case study is based on a genuine property transaction in Leopold, Victoria. The address, purchaser identities and certain identifying circumstances have been omitted or generalised to protect privacy and confidentiality. The $35,000 increase represents the difference between the leading purchaser's initial offer and the subsequently agreed offer, as confirmed in the seller's published review. The approximate $50,000 difference between offers reflects the agent's account of the relevant stage of negotiations. Buyer motivations and negotiation considerations are described from the agent's perspective. No individual negotiation technique can be isolated as the sole cause of the final result. Individual sales differ, and past performance does not guarantee future outcomes.

← Read more Behind the Sale stories